South Africa's ruling African National Congress (ANC) has formally asked President Jacob Zuma to resign "for the sake of the country"...
But despite the ANC's top leadership deciding to "recall" him "urgently", the scandal-hit Mr Zuma was still in power on Tuesday.
He is expected to respond to the request on Wednesday, an official said.
He had already told them he was willing to stand down in the next three to six months, the official added.
Mr Zuma, who has been in power since 2009, has been dogged by corruption allegations.
But he has so far resisted increasing pressure to quit since December, when Cyril Ramaphosa replaced him as leader of the ANC.
Ace Magashule, the ANC's secretary-general, told reporters the party's National Executive Committee (NEC) decided the removal should be "treated with urgency".
"The NEC has noted South Africa is going through a period of uncertainty and anxiety as a result of unresolved matter of transition," he said.
Mr Magashule said the country needed to build on the "renewed hope" felt after the election of Mr Ramaphosa as ANC leader.
"It is obvious we want Comrade Ramaphosa to come in as the president of South Africa," he added.
He said the president was expected to respond to the NEC's decision on Wednesday, although they had given him no deadline.
"When we recall our deployee, we expect our deployee to do as asked," Mr Magashule said.
But South Africa's opposition parties have already expressed reservations about Mr Magashule's confidence.
"The only way to remove Jacob Zuma as president of our country is for parliament to do so through a motion of no confidence," the Democratic Alliance (DA) tweeted.
It called the motion brought by fellow opposition group, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), to be brought forward from 22 February so parliament can "remove Jacob Zuma".
What has Mr Zuma done wrong?
Mr Zuma's presidency has been overshadowed by allegations of corruption which he has always vehemently denied.
In 2016, South Africa's highest court ruled that Mr Zuma had violated the constitution when he failed to repay government money spent on his private home.
Last year the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that he must face 18 counts of corruption, fraud, racketeering and money-laundering relating to a 1999 arms deal.
No comments: