With outbreaks in Africa and the following response of having to deal with entire communities of sick individuals, when paired with the high mortality of the virus, both media and politics took note on a virus virtually unknown before. Recently, the 2017 American Society of Microbiology concluded their Biothreats conference which covers the handling of outbreaks both natural and man-made, and possible threats to the future. Alongside the main conference were several sessions dedicated to diseases that are often neglected, which got us thinking: Could one of these now under-recognized diseases be the next Ebola?
What do we mean by the “Next Ebola”?
Before we can truly establish what these five diseases could be, we first have to take a look at Ebola itself. Ebola, or more specifically Ebola Zaire is a disease that originally got its name from a river near the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and carries with it a high local mortality rate, typically due to a lack of adequate hydration and nutrition supplies to help people survive the fight with the virus, as well as facilities to lock down these individuals to prevent spread. Like many other viruses that cause hemorrhagic fever, Ebola is classed as a high risk for use in bioterrorism, and is alongside the likes of Anthrax, Smallpox and Plague in terms of both lethality and fear factor. However, making a list from only these would only be telling half the story. Between 1976 and 2014, very little work had been done to progress the treating of Ebola, and just now Ebola vaccines have shown distinct promise. So instead, we will look at those similar to Ebola from the get-go: Underreported, under recognized diseases that may pose a significant threat to both the populations close to viral origin, and the world at large if nothing is done.5. Elizabethkingia meningoseptica
4. Schistosomiasis
3. Visceral Leishmaniasis
2. Chikungunya
1. Meliodosis
Topping our list for the next potential Ebola level epidemic is a disease that you have likely never heard of, despite it being responsible for at least 90,000 deaths a year (though this number is likely much higher, given both underreporting and misdiagnosis). While initially thought to be native to southeast Asia and north Australia, recent studies suggest that the bacteria causing Meliodosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei can be found in over 90 countries’ water and soil. Detection is particularly hard for this disease, as it can lay dormant for on average 9 days, but has been recorded as being asymptomatic for over sixty years in the case of at least one patient, and at least several years for several US soldiers who served in Vietnam. Symptoms of this disease do vary, but often contain chronic lung and skin infections with symptoms similar to Tuberculosis, fever, chest and joint pain, arthritis, and abscesses throughout the body, including the brain. In taking the average of mortality reports, one can expect around a 70% fatality rate, which is on par with Ebola. This is of all the greater concern, due to the fact that this disease has previously been so neglected it has yet to even show on the World Health Organization’s list of neglected diseases. Due to the multi-antibiotic resistant nature of the bacteria, currently care is focused on upkeep of the body, and the use of multiple high-class antibiotics which do garner some success. However, failing the availability of these high class antibiotics, secondary antibiotics are often used to astonishingly low success (with about 20% of patients surviving). Luckily in this case, person to person spread of this disease is remarkably rare, despite the bacteria being found to be more common than expected in water and soil samples. While not the most pressing issue in terms of epidemics for many of us, it should at the very least be something to be investigated, and treatment protocols to be worked on.
gazettereview
No comments: